<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Websites and value</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.burnsautoparts.com/blog/2008/02/01/websites-and-value/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.burnsautoparts.com/blog/2008/02/01/websites-and-value/</link>
	<description>Leslie Burns-Dell'Acqua writes on the photo business and marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 04:28:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Pickard</title>
		<link>http://www.burnsautoparts.com/blog/2008/02/01/websites-and-value/comment-page-1/#comment-29745</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Pickard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 03:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnsautoparts.com/blog/2008/02/01/websites-and-value/#comment-29745</guid>
		<description>I read that thread on APE and agree, a lot of people missed the point. 

In many ways the take home message about web sites for me is:

- the design has to compliment the photos, not the other way around (www.claystang.com) is a good example of where the design seems to overwhelm the imagery IMHO

- having sites with a certain, sharpish look and a &#039;production value&#039; have an intrinsic value in their own right.

Does this mean it has to be Livebooks? Of course not. They are just one option of many that offer a fine product - though personally I hate how the thumbnails are programmed (sorry).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read that thread on APE and agree, a lot of people missed the point. </p>
<p>In many ways the take home message about web sites for me is:</p>
<p>- the design has to compliment the photos, not the other way around (www.claystang.com) is a good example of where the design seems to overwhelm the imagery IMHO</p>
<p>- having sites with a certain, sharpish look and a &#8216;production value&#8217; have an intrinsic value in their own right.</p>
<p>Does this mean it has to be Livebooks? Of course not. They are just one option of many that offer a fine product &#8211; though personally I hate how the thumbnails are programmed (sorry).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce DeBoer</title>
		<link>http://www.burnsautoparts.com/blog/2008/02/01/websites-and-value/comment-page-1/#comment-27650</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce DeBoer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 20:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnsautoparts.com/blog/2008/02/01/websites-and-value/#comment-27650</guid>
		<description>Another worthless opinion:

I think Clay&#039;s portfolio is a classic case where a Live Books site would be an improvement.  I simply Can Not get through it.  Even with improved programming it is unfriendly and way to slow to draw the nav.

http://www.claystang.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another worthless opinion:</p>
<p>I think Clay&#8217;s portfolio is a classic case where a Live Books site would be an improvement.  I simply Can Not get through it.  Even with improved programming it is unfriendly and way to slow to draw the nav.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.claystang.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.claystang.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce DeBoer</title>
		<link>http://www.burnsautoparts.com/blog/2008/02/01/websites-and-value/comment-page-1/#comment-27647</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce DeBoer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 20:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnsautoparts.com/blog/2008/02/01/websites-and-value/#comment-27647</guid>
		<description>I think your position is a good one.  LB sites or those like them are - to me - the common denominator rather than &quot;the standard&quot; of the industry.  &quot;The standard&quot; often implies that it&#039;s closer to state of the art than it is.  I believer you&#039;re right to say that if you can&#039;t afford a well designed custom site, go with Live Books.  If you absolutely can&#039;t afford it, at least make sure the &quot;Honda Fit&quot; site design doesn&#039;t get it the way of enjoying the work.

I&#039;d like to add, however, that differentiation is more than the work we shoot.  Having a well designed site that doesn&#039;t look like everyone else&#039;s is a good piece of an overall marketing plan.  A strong, well developed back end can also contribute to a smooth work flow.

I just upgraded my site and the response has surprised me a little.  It&#039;s as if no one has seen my work before, when, in fact, there is nothing on this site that hasn&#039;t at some point been on the old one.  It always amazes me how big a difference presentation can make.  Sometimes we all need to be reminded of that..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think your position is a good one.  LB sites or those like them are &#8211; to me &#8211; the common denominator rather than &#8220;the standard&#8221; of the industry.  &#8220;The standard&#8221; often implies that it&#8217;s closer to state of the art than it is.  I believer you&#8217;re right to say that if you can&#8217;t afford a well designed custom site, go with Live Books.  If you absolutely can&#8217;t afford it, at least make sure the &#8220;Honda Fit&#8221; site design doesn&#8217;t get it the way of enjoying the work.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to add, however, that differentiation is more than the work we shoot.  Having a well designed site that doesn&#8217;t look like everyone else&#8217;s is a good piece of an overall marketing plan.  A strong, well developed back end can also contribute to a smooth work flow.</p>
<p>I just upgraded my site and the response has surprised me a little.  It&#8217;s as if no one has seen my work before, when, in fact, there is nothing on this site that hasn&#8217;t at some point been on the old one.  It always amazes me how big a difference presentation can make.  Sometimes we all need to be reminded of that..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
