<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google&#8217;s Chrome not so shiny</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.burnsautoparts.com/blog/2008/09/03/googles-chrome-not-so-shiny/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.burnsautoparts.com/blog/2008/09/03/googles-chrome-not-so-shiny/</link>
	<description>Leslie Burns-Dell'Acqua writes on the photo business and marketing</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 22:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: dougphoto</title>
		<link>http://www.burnsautoparts.com/blog/2008/09/03/googles-chrome-not-so-shiny/comment-page-1/#comment-35742</link>
		<dc:creator>dougphoto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 04:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnsautoparts.com/blog/?p=620#comment-35742</guid>
		<description>does this mean they own everything put into blogger already or just stuff put on blogger through chrome?  I have a couple pretty active blogs I'd hate to loose all that content to them, or see it miss used.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>does this mean they own everything put into blogger already or just stuff put on blogger through chrome?  I have a couple pretty active blogs I&#8217;d hate to loose all that content to them, or see it miss used.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tammy Cravit</title>
		<link>http://www.burnsautoparts.com/blog/2008/09/03/googles-chrome-not-so-shiny/comment-page-1/#comment-35728</link>
		<dc:creator>Tammy Cravit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 21:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnsautoparts.com/blog/?p=620#comment-35728</guid>
		<description>Ack, forgot links for my comment:

http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/google-chrome-license-agreement/

The article you linked to, Leslie, has also been updated to reflect the update.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ack, forgot links for my comment:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/google-chrome-license-agreement/" rel="nofollow">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/google-chrome-license-agreement/</a></p>
<p>The article you linked to, Leslie, has also been updated to reflect the update.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tammy Cravit</title>
		<link>http://www.burnsautoparts.com/blog/2008/09/03/googles-chrome-not-so-shiny/comment-page-1/#comment-35727</link>
		<dc:creator>Tammy Cravit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 21:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnsautoparts.com/blog/?p=620#comment-35727</guid>
		<description>Official response now from the Google folks (via Google employee Matt Cutts's blog, among others):

"In order to keep things simple for our users, we try to use the same set of legal terms (our Universal Terms of Service) for many of our products. Sometimes, as in the case of Google Chrome, this means that the legal terms for a specific product may include terms that don’t apply well to the use of that product. We are working quickly to remove language from Section 11 of the current Google Chrome terms of service. This change will apply retroactively to all users who have downloaded Google Chrome.”

The above was attributed to Rebecca Ward, Senior Product Counsel for Google Chrome. 

Not to say that people might not want to wait until after the license agreement is revised to try Chrome, of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Official response now from the Google folks (via Google employee Matt Cutts&#8217;s blog, among others):</p>
<p>&#8220;In order to keep things simple for our users, we try to use the same set of legal terms (our Universal Terms of Service) for many of our products. Sometimes, as in the case of Google Chrome, this means that the legal terms for a specific product may include terms that don’t apply well to the use of that product. We are working quickly to remove language from Section 11 of the current Google Chrome terms of service. This change will apply retroactively to all users who have downloaded Google Chrome.”</p>
<p>The above was attributed to Rebecca Ward, Senior Product Counsel for Google Chrome. </p>
<p>Not to say that people might not want to wait until after the license agreement is revised to try Chrome, of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Durisseau</title>
		<link>http://www.burnsautoparts.com/blog/2008/09/03/googles-chrome-not-so-shiny/comment-page-1/#comment-35724</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Durisseau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 19:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnsautoparts.com/blog/?p=620#comment-35724</guid>
		<description>Not using that browser until those terms change!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not using that browser until those terms change!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
