<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Job of Art Buyer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.burnsautoparts.com/blog/2008/09/14/the-job-of-art-buyer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.burnsautoparts.com/blog/2008/09/14/the-job-of-art-buyer/</link>
	<description>Leslie Burns writes on the photo business and marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 04:43:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ask an Art Buyer: Copyright &#8212; HeatherMortonArt buyer</title>
		<link>http://www.burnsautoparts.com/blog/2008/09/14/the-job-of-art-buyer/comment-page-1/#comment-35901</link>
		<dc:creator>Ask an Art Buyer: Copyright &#8212; HeatherMortonArt buyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 19:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnsautoparts.com/blog/?p=646#comment-35901</guid>
		<description>[...] ever-wise photography consultant Leslie Burns-Dell&#8217;Acqua has a fantastic post about what Art Buyers do. I take my role as an advocate for photography very seriously. In fact, I have argued for an [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ever-wise photography consultant Leslie Burns-Dell&#8217;Acqua has a fantastic post about what Art Buyers do. I take my role as an advocate for photography very seriously. In fact, I have argued for an [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Back Bacon</title>
		<link>http://www.burnsautoparts.com/blog/2008/09/14/the-job-of-art-buyer/comment-page-1/#comment-35863</link>
		<dc:creator>Back Bacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 19:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnsautoparts.com/blog/?p=646#comment-35863</guid>
		<description>Agreed - AB&#039;s may not have much choice here. That&#039;s what concerns me. And why I&#039;m asking why the agencies don&#039;t take a stand - if for no other reason than to ensure their work (the creative, the ad) turns out as best as it can. I hear AD&#039;s complain abut lousy budgets, yet the agency does noting abut it.

But who decides the budget? I&#039;d like to believe that it&#039;s a function of AB&#039;s to be involved with this, not simply the client dictating, or worse the client pulling a figure out of a hat. Has the collaboration process gone missing? I&#039;d like to believe the AB&#039;s would provide insight into what it costs to produce an ad, and with the support of their agency, fight for an appropriate budget to work with the an appropriate photographer for the job (as decided collectively) and to create a great ad.

And if as you say the AB&#039;s are loosing the support of their bosses, I wonder why the agencies senior people don&#039;t stand up for the sake of executing the best they can. Surely it&#039;s in the best interests of the agency to also push for appropriate budgets so their ads turn out as best they can. Isn&#039;t the agencies reputation on the line? Don&#039;t they want to produce great work more often? 

Because I&#039;m afraid what you&#039;re saying is that money has trumped everything.... including the outcome of the creative.

Still hoping someone can provide additional insights into the inner circle of agency/client dealings. I think there&#039;s an opportunity to make some positive improvements, not just for the photographers but the agencies and clients too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed &#8211; AB&#8217;s may not have much choice here. That&#8217;s what concerns me. And why I&#8217;m asking why the agencies don&#8217;t take a stand &#8211; if for no other reason than to ensure their work (the creative, the ad) turns out as best as it can. I hear AD&#8217;s complain abut lousy budgets, yet the agency does noting abut it.</p>
<p>But who decides the budget? I&#8217;d like to believe that it&#8217;s a function of AB&#8217;s to be involved with this, not simply the client dictating, or worse the client pulling a figure out of a hat. Has the collaboration process gone missing? I&#8217;d like to believe the AB&#8217;s would provide insight into what it costs to produce an ad, and with the support of their agency, fight for an appropriate budget to work with the an appropriate photographer for the job (as decided collectively) and to create a great ad.</p>
<p>And if as you say the AB&#8217;s are loosing the support of their bosses, I wonder why the agencies senior people don&#8217;t stand up for the sake of executing the best they can. Surely it&#8217;s in the best interests of the agency to also push for appropriate budgets so their ads turn out as best they can. Isn&#8217;t the agencies reputation on the line? Don&#8217;t they want to produce great work more often? </p>
<p>Because I&#8217;m afraid what you&#8217;re saying is that money has trumped everything&#8230;. including the outcome of the creative.</p>
<p>Still hoping someone can provide additional insights into the inner circle of agency/client dealings. I think there&#8217;s an opportunity to make some positive improvements, not just for the photographers but the agencies and clients too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: info</title>
		<link>http://www.burnsautoparts.com/blog/2008/09/14/the-job-of-art-buyer/comment-page-1/#comment-35862</link>
		<dc:creator>info</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 18:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnsautoparts.com/blog/?p=646#comment-35862</guid>
		<description>Bacon:
I think that rolling over for the client is more a function of Accounts Services and the powers-that-be than the ABs. But, at the end of the day, if your job depended on you working within the budget provided and not making too big of a stink about it, I think most people would hold their noses and do what what necessary. 

Like you wrote, too many are losing the support of their bosses. What choices to they really have in that situation then? 
-Leslie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bacon:<br />
I think that rolling over for the client is more a function of Accounts Services and the powers-that-be than the ABs. But, at the end of the day, if your job depended on you working within the budget provided and not making too big of a stink about it, I think most people would hold their noses and do what what necessary. </p>
<p>Like you wrote, too many are losing the support of their bosses. What choices to they really have in that situation then?<br />
-Leslie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Back Bacon</title>
		<link>http://www.burnsautoparts.com/blog/2008/09/14/the-job-of-art-buyer/comment-page-1/#comment-35858</link>
		<dc:creator>Back Bacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 14:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnsautoparts.com/blog/?p=646#comment-35858</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve read a lot about art buyers, photo editors, art directors, creative directors, and even photographer consultants, being staunch supporters of photographers - and there&#039;s no question in my mind that this is true. 

However, I wonder if there is a disconnect between art buying and the client. That is to say, do the account reps and agency executives have the same knowledge &amp; appreciation of the value of photography that the art buyer does?

Because photographers deal with art buyers and AD&#039;s every day, for me at least, there is big unknown when it comes to the mysterious dealings happening between the agency and the client - and that has the potential for the value of photography to get lost. A massive black whole, where the seller and the buyer rarely, if ever, communicate directly.

Now I could be way off here, but it seems to me that there is a role for agencies to not just fight a little harder for photo budgets, but also to educate clients. I wonder if, over the last 10-20 years, agencies have become fearful to lose an account and have lost their backbone. I&#039;m not blaming art buyers (see above - I know how hard the fight) but there are many other corporate levels and interactions going on between agencies and clients that I am questioning.

Because I&#039;ve noticed a trend - art buyers and agencies in general have become &#039;yes men&#039; to the clients. While art buyers (and to a certain degree account reps) may be fighting, I believe that these battles are no longer being fought with the same passion or commitment as in the past. Is it just me, or do art buyers and account reps no longer have quite the same clout or agency support they once had?

While I genuinely appreciate the efforts of art buyers and art directors - who obviously would love to have larger budgets approved to execute their vision - it seems to me there isn&#039;t the same incentive to do so as there once was. 

Is it simply fear of the client, have AB&#039;s lost the support of their bosses, are agencies rewarded by clients (like some cost consultants) for chopping budgets, or is it something else?

Perhaps this is the new norm - the fear of an agency pissing off a client.

It&#039;s a shame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve read a lot about art buyers, photo editors, art directors, creative directors, and even photographer consultants, being staunch supporters of photographers &#8211; and there&#8217;s no question in my mind that this is true. </p>
<p>However, I wonder if there is a disconnect between art buying and the client. That is to say, do the account reps and agency executives have the same knowledge &amp; appreciation of the value of photography that the art buyer does?</p>
<p>Because photographers deal with art buyers and AD&#8217;s every day, for me at least, there is big unknown when it comes to the mysterious dealings happening between the agency and the client &#8211; and that has the potential for the value of photography to get lost. A massive black whole, where the seller and the buyer rarely, if ever, communicate directly.</p>
<p>Now I could be way off here, but it seems to me that there is a role for agencies to not just fight a little harder for photo budgets, but also to educate clients. I wonder if, over the last 10-20 years, agencies have become fearful to lose an account and have lost their backbone. I&#8217;m not blaming art buyers (see above &#8211; I know how hard the fight) but there are many other corporate levels and interactions going on between agencies and clients that I am questioning.</p>
<p>Because I&#8217;ve noticed a trend &#8211; art buyers and agencies in general have become &#8216;yes men&#8217; to the clients. While art buyers (and to a certain degree account reps) may be fighting, I believe that these battles are no longer being fought with the same passion or commitment as in the past. Is it just me, or do art buyers and account reps no longer have quite the same clout or agency support they once had?</p>
<p>While I genuinely appreciate the efforts of art buyers and art directors &#8211; who obviously would love to have larger budgets approved to execute their vision &#8211; it seems to me there isn&#8217;t the same incentive to do so as there once was. </p>
<p>Is it simply fear of the client, have AB&#8217;s lost the support of their bosses, are agencies rewarded by clients (like some cost consultants) for chopping budgets, or is it something else?</p>
<p>Perhaps this is the new norm &#8211; the fear of an agency pissing off a client.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a shame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danno</title>
		<link>http://www.burnsautoparts.com/blog/2008/09/14/the-job-of-art-buyer/comment-page-1/#comment-35849</link>
		<dc:creator>Danno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 23:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnsautoparts.com/blog/?p=646#comment-35849</guid>
		<description>good food-for-thought!


Rocksteady,
Danno~</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good food-for-thought!</p>
<p>Rocksteady,<br />
Danno~</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

