<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The end of agencies?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.burnsautoparts.com/blog/2008/10/21/the-end-of-agencies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.burnsautoparts.com/blog/2008/10/21/the-end-of-agencies/</link>
	<description>Leslie Burns writes on the photo business and marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 04:43:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce DeBoer</title>
		<link>http://www.burnsautoparts.com/blog/2008/10/21/the-end-of-agencies/comment-page-1/#comment-36259</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce DeBoer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 03:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnsautoparts.com/blog/?p=740#comment-36259</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s a cycle - Agencies are expensive, uncontrollable and don&#039;t always seem to understand our business. They seem to add another level of slow response to a cycle.  Yeah their creative can be good but I&#039;m not always sure it&#039;s on target. And those branding ads - do they do anything at all?

Let&#039;s pull it in house to save money and so we can be sure they respond quickly and understand our strategy and our product much better.  THe creative seems ok - nearly as good as the agencies.

Hey - we have this really important product that has to break through big.  I&#039;ve gotten to know all the guys on the 3rd floor and I don&#039;t think there up to it.  Who&#039;s the hot agency since we pulled everything in house?  Hire the real creative one with pharma experience.

and again, and again, and again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s a cycle &#8211; Agencies are expensive, uncontrollable and don&#8217;t always seem to understand our business. They seem to add another level of slow response to a cycle.  Yeah their creative can be good but I&#8217;m not always sure it&#8217;s on target. And those branding ads &#8211; do they do anything at all?</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s pull it in house to save money and so we can be sure they respond quickly and understand our strategy and our product much better.  THe creative seems ok &#8211; nearly as good as the agencies.</p>
<p>Hey &#8211; we have this really important product that has to break through big.  I&#8217;ve gotten to know all the guys on the 3rd floor and I don&#8217;t think there up to it.  Who&#8217;s the hot agency since we pulled everything in house?  Hire the real creative one with pharma experience.</p>
<p>and again, and again, and again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Blei</title>
		<link>http://www.burnsautoparts.com/blog/2008/10/21/the-end-of-agencies/comment-page-1/#comment-36211</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Blei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnsautoparts.com/blog/?p=740#comment-36211</guid>
		<description>The &quot;Advertising Age&quot; story was interesting.  The one word that was repeated throughout the story was &quot;relationship.&quot;  It&#039;s the one thing that we can&#039;t do without.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;Advertising Age&#8221; story was interesting.  The one word that was repeated throughout the story was &#8220;relationship.&#8221;  It&#8217;s the one thing that we can&#8217;t do without.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danno</title>
		<link>http://www.burnsautoparts.com/blog/2008/10/21/the-end-of-agencies/comment-page-1/#comment-36202</link>
		<dc:creator>Danno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 06:19:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnsautoparts.com/blog/?p=740#comment-36202</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s something that companies are doing and have been doing for a little while.  its then up to the company on how each one individually feels about the creative process.  

there&#039;s a rather large company that my friend was the in-house art director for and they didn&#039;t value art or the creative process.  they had gone from have an agency handle both media and creative to moving in-house to help save costs , along with many other reasons.  after they got the results that they weren&#039;t being received nearly as well from the in-house department as compared to when the agency handled it , they actually took a look at it and decided : its cheaper in-house.  they didn&#039;t care about the return.  they didn&#039;t care about the quality coming out.  they only cared about the money saved up front, not the return on investment.

now that&#039;s of course only one company and their one decision to do so, but i&#039;m guessing it&#039;s not the only occurrence of this happening.

ps: because of their decision NOT to go back to the agency that had done things 10x better than in-house did (with their added restrictions) my friend quit the company to go freelance and is doing better than he&#039;s ever done working for &#039;the man&#039;.


Rocksteady,
Danno~</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s something that companies are doing and have been doing for a little while.  its then up to the company on how each one individually feels about the creative process.  </p>
<p>there&#8217;s a rather large company that my friend was the in-house art director for and they didn&#8217;t value art or the creative process.  they had gone from have an agency handle both media and creative to moving in-house to help save costs , along with many other reasons.  after they got the results that they weren&#8217;t being received nearly as well from the in-house department as compared to when the agency handled it , they actually took a look at it and decided : its cheaper in-house.  they didn&#8217;t care about the return.  they didn&#8217;t care about the quality coming out.  they only cared about the money saved up front, not the return on investment.</p>
<p>now that&#8217;s of course only one company and their one decision to do so, but i&#8217;m guessing it&#8217;s not the only occurrence of this happening.</p>
<p>ps: because of their decision NOT to go back to the agency that had done things 10x better than in-house did (with their added restrictions) my friend quit the company to go freelance and is doing better than he&#8217;s ever done working for &#8216;the man&#8217;.</p>
<p>Rocksteady,<br />
Danno~</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

